Skip to content

Z80 vs 1802What Do I think?

December 20, 2015

Just for my notes:

  • Per the z88dk site, the 4mhz z80 with an excellent compiler can do 310 dhrystones/sec.
  • The table quotes 258M Z80 cycles for what I assume is 20K repetitions of the benchmark.  That’s 13k cycles per pass.
  • I’m guessing that translates to 1500 instructions/pass based on 8 cycles/instruction average(my guess).
  • My 1.6mhz 1802 with the rhinestone compiler could squeak out 27 dhrystones/sec.  At 4mhz that would be 65 dhrystones/sec.
  • My notes say the 1802 was doing 3700 instructions/pass which makes sense since the 1802 is usually moving only 8 bits/inst where the z80 is often 16 and the 1802 can use three instructions to move a byte from register to register.

So 2.5X as many instructions for the 1802 and 2X as many cycles/instruction maps pretty well to the relative dhrystone performance.

As against that, I was able to develop the LCC1802 port on my own in a couple of months where the Z80 compilers have had many years of multiple contributors.

If I ever get the olduino/Z back on the rails I’ll have a good look at some low level code and see if i can learn anything applicable to the 1802.

Advertisements

From → Olduino/Z

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: